This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Allergy & Intolerance substance September 2017 ballot outline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Statement of problem Substance codes too numerous to manage effectivley; specifically, C-CDA UI design message validation correct level of specificity errors based on G...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Back to [[Allergy & Intolerance Drug Sub-project]] | |
| − | Substance codes too numerous to manage effectivley; specifically, C-CDA | + | * Statement of problem: Substance codes too numerous to manage effectivley; specifically, C-CDA |
| − | + | ** UI design | |
| − | + | ** message validation | |
| − | + | ** correct level of specificity | |
| − | + | ** errors based on | |
| − | Goal: short list, heuristic | + | * Goal: short list, heuristic |
| − | + | ** easy to pick 99% of time | |
| − | + | ** easy to validate | |
| − | + | ** also | |
| − | + | *** correct level of specificity based on immunological understanding of cross-reactivity | |
| − | + | *** omit junk (fish, seafood) | |
| − | Considerations | + | * Considerations |
| − | + | ** not pharmacovigilance. compare FHIR properties. | |
| − | + | ** length - ask about useful length | |
| − | + | ** system tbd. so far realm-specific. | |
| − | collection | + | * collection |
| − | + | ** describe data (period, source) | |
| − | + | ** string not code. prior to map. therefore some junk. | |
| − | + | ** duplication | |
| − | + | ** weighting | |
| − | + | ** distribution | |
| − | + | ** mapping threshold. junk, significance. | |
| − | issues found | + | * issues found |
| − | + | ** boundaries: caffeine, eggs, | |
| − | + | ** herbals: no system. if rxnorm, else sct | |
| − | + | ** biologics - blood religious. vaccine: cvx too specific (russ . . .) | |
| − | + | ** salts no | |
| − | + | ** classes: NDF criteria not cross-reactive; use SCT. check Goss. | |
| − | + | ** route: salicylates, iodine, | |
| − | + | ** cross-reactive: | |
| − | + | *** penicillin redefine | |
| − | + | ** clinical: iodine, contrast. Keep iodine topical, iodine contrast(?), add high-osmolality | |
| − | + | ** metal, influenza, kinds of tape | |
| − | QA process | + | * QA process |
| − | + | ** heuristic | |
| − | + | ** multiples | |
| − | + | ** ballot | |
| − | findings | + | * findings |
| − | + | ** list | |
| − | + | ** dispersion by institution | |
| − | + | ** top X% in Y# | |
Revision as of 17:22, 28 June 2017
Back to Allergy & Intolerance Drug Sub-project
- Statement of problem: Substance codes too numerous to manage effectivley; specifically, C-CDA
- UI design
- message validation
- correct level of specificity
- errors based on
- Goal: short list, heuristic
- easy to pick 99% of time
- easy to validate
- also
- correct level of specificity based on immunological understanding of cross-reactivity
- omit junk (fish, seafood)
- Considerations
- not pharmacovigilance. compare FHIR properties.
- length - ask about useful length
- system tbd. so far realm-specific.
- collection
- describe data (period, source)
- string not code. prior to map. therefore some junk.
- duplication
- weighting
- distribution
- mapping threshold. junk, significance.
- issues found
- boundaries: caffeine, eggs,
- herbals: no system. if rxnorm, else sct
- biologics - blood religious. vaccine: cvx too specific (russ . . .)
- salts no
- classes: NDF criteria not cross-reactive; use SCT. check Goss.
- route: salicylates, iodine,
- cross-reactive:
- penicillin redefine
- clinical: iodine, contrast. Keep iodine topical, iodine contrast(?), add high-osmolality
- metal, influenza, kinds of tape
- QA process
- heuristic
- multiples
- ballot
- findings
- list
- dispersion by institution
- top X% in Y#
