This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2018-05-02 SGB Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-05-02 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| x | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| x | Russ Hamm | ||
| Tony Julian | |||
| x | Paul Knapp | ||
| Ewout Kramer | |||
| x | Austin Kreisler | ||
| x | Wayne Kubick | ||
| x | Thom Kuhn | ||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| x | Rik Smithies | ||
| x | Sandy Stuart | ||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-04-25_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to send reminder to Voca/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Ongoing
- Austin to attend FMG to discuss the balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR
- Wayne and Calvin to bring up the issue on Monday's EC call
- Send a note to affiliates list and members requesting additional international representation on CIMI-MG
- Paul to send reminder to Voca/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Review CIMI candidate list
- Cologne Agenda and cochair dinner topics
- Carried forward from previous week:
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-04-25_SGB_Conference_Call
- MOTION to approve: Calvin/Austin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Action Items
- Paul to send reminder to Voca/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Paul will meet with them in Cologne
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to work on adding links on precepts page to approval minutes for each precept
- Ongoing
- Austin to attend FMG to discuss the balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR
- Complete
- Wayne and Calvin to bring up the issue on Monday's EC call
- Send a note to affiliates list and members requesting additional international representation on CIMI-MG
- ACTION: Anne to draft
- Paul to send reminder to Voca/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Review CIMI candidate list
- Could approve a subset or wait until we get more international volunteers. Rik suggests Michael Van der Zel. Will likely be in Cologne. William Goossen will likely be there as well. Richard Esmond will attend the product family management group council meeting on Monday Q0. No one from publishing is available.
- Cologne Agenda and cochair dinner topics
- Reviewed and adjusted Sunday and Friday agendas.
- Co-chair dinner topics: Decision to remind people of where SGB fits within HL7. Show a precept or two as an example, and show where they are located. Discussion over how precepts are communicated – need a communication plan. Could send out email to co-chairs like TSC update and link from resources page. Paul notes that most of this stuff will be developed through the management groups. Wayne states we should add who is responsible for implementing to each precept – WG cochairs, management groups, or both. Thom asks about how communication comes in…should it filter through TSC or management groups? Paul states that we have to be open to anything. Calvin notes it should be brought through a committee with consensus that there is a problem.
- Review CIMI candidate list
- Carried forward from previous week:
- Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
- Normative balloting/continuous balloting in FHIR
- Review FHIR artifact governance process
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
