This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

20110706 SAIF AP ConCall

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-07-06 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas


Meeting Logistics

Agenda

  1. Role Call
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Doodle Poll Results: To include the EHR S FM project #551 within the SAIF AP initiative
  4. Introducing New Processes to HL7 document from Project Services Work Group (aka 'Adoption Process')
    1. Link to the HL7 Adoption Process_draftV6.doc (GForge)
    2. The Adoption Process seems to fall under the governance area
    3. TSC has requested the SAIF AP team to review it. Review it this week and the following week we can discuss how the SAIF AP wants to adopt it.
  5. Action item review (see below)
  6. Recurring Agenda Items
    1. Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)
      1. Any new Coordination items? (Team)
      2. Project Schedule progress (Rick Haddorff)
  7. Next steps

Action Items to Review

1945: How should we go about having the Security Cookbook integrate within the OO CO project? <br\> Jane Curry / John Moehrke Update from her discussion with John about perhaps identifying Security in the Business Context artifact of the SAIF IG<br\> Today’s Update: No update; Jane was not on the call.<br\> Austin/Pat: There will be coordination needed between EHR and Security Cookbook regards to the new EHR S FM project #551<br\> <br\> 1947: Do we need a PSS for the CMET Management Clean-up and New Process? <br\> Team: Determine who who should be the sponsor? MnM? TSC? Project Services?? Have it go through all SDs for review/approval?<br\> Today’s Update: We do need to have MnM on the call to finalize the Sponsor decision. Austin will bring up in today’s MnM call<br\> <br\> 1944: Should a SAIF Governance document be created via the SAIF Pilot Coordination Project? <br\> Team: Should we have a project focused solely on Governance, or have it as a chapter in the SAIF IG guide (as part MnM’s project)?<br\>

  • Austin feels it will be a chapter in the SAIF IG Guide. <br\>
  • Action out of this discussion: update the SAIF Pilot Coordination project schedule deliverable to indicate as such. <br\>

Today’s Update: Would like MnM’s input on this. Austin will bring up in today’s MnM call <br\> <br\> 1851: Logo Ideas for the SAIF AP <br\> Team: Two have been submitted. What is next step for this? Doodle poll the listserv? Today’s Update: Has Marketing been involved?<br\> Next Step: Take a straw poll among the team to determine which is preferred. After that, check in with Marketing.<br\> <br\>

Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)

Meeting Attendees

X=Present on Call

Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) David Hamill
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Austin Kreisler TSC Chair
Brian Pech Interested Participant
X David Hamill HL7 HQ / Program Manager
Ed Tripp Domain Experts SD \ TSC
Gregg Seppala Product Quality Plan Project
Jane Curry Tooling
Jim McClay Emergency Care
John Moehrke Security Cookbook
John Quinn HL7 CTO
Lloyd McKenzie MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
Lorraine Constable Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
Patrick Loyd OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X Rick Haddorff Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
Robert Lario Object Management
Steve Hufnagel ArB / SAIF Book Project / SOA
X Wendy Huang Implementation Conformance WG
Gary Dickinson EHR WG
X Pat Van Dyke EHR WG
X Freida Hall Project Services WG
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Doodle Poll Results: To include the EHR S FM project #551 within the SAIF AP initiative
Vote: Affirmative: 6 Negative: 0 Abstain: 0

Introducing New Processes to HL7 document from Project Services Work Group (aka 'Adoption Process')

  • Origination was from work on the Security Cookbook…there was no formal process documented to introduce a new process into HL7.
  • TSC asked Project Services to document such a process.
  • The draft process document has been approved by Project Services and reviewed by Charlie Mead of the ArB.
  • Austin: Perhaps add a new choice to the Project Scope Statement to indicate a ‘New/Modified HL7 Process’
  • Austin: For administering comments, another suggestion might be to create a Wiki page to capture them.
  • Austin: Regarding the RASCI chart process discussed in last week’s call, perhaps that needs to go through the Adoption Process. However, this would imply the RASCI chart process would require a project scope statement.
  • Two candidates to pilot the process: RASCI chart process and CMET management process.
  • Next Steps:
  • Project Services will consider today’s feedback and modify the document accordingly.


Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd

Adjourned 11:00 AM Eastern Time

New Action Items

Pat – Create a Wiki page for project #551 - EHR S FM project Austin – Send Pat how to add a Category to a project page; Copy Dave on the email. - DONE
Austin – Talk to Marketing about the Logo (after the doodle poll is complete)
Austin – Follow up with MnM on Trackers 1947, 1944 - DONE
Freida – Add to the Adoption Process document: For administering comments, another suggestion might be to create a Wiki page to capture them. - DONE
Rick – Add EHR and Security coordination to the SAIF Pilot Coordination project
Dave - add a Tracker item for the above coordination item. - DONE
Dave – Modify Project Insight to have #551 be under the SAIF AP umbrella - DONE
Dave – Send Pat the link to the Wiki Project Template - DONE
Dave – Forward the Category info to Lynn to include in the Wiki Project template page - DONE
Dave – Add the following to the Project Services Tracker that keeps track of suggested changes to the Project Scope Statement: add a new choice to the Project Scope Statement to indicate a ‘New/Modified HL7 Process’ (this might be in the Project Intent area – where the type of ballot is selected) - DONE
Dave – Create a Doodle poll for the logo